Grigsby v. State

183 S.W. 143, 79 Tex. Crim. 84, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 69
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 1916
DocketNo. 3957.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 183 S.W. 143 (Grigsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grigsby v. State, 183 S.W. 143, 79 Tex. Crim. 84, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 69 (Tex. 1916).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant 'appealed his case from the Corporation Court to the County Court, in which latter court the case was tried de novo, and a fine of $100 imposed. *85 Motion is made to dismiss the appeal because this judgment is final, not being in excess of $100. This is a correct motion under article 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1911. See 2 vol. Vernon’s Crim. Stat., art. 87, and note containing a great number of decisions upon this question. That statute requires finality of judgment in the County Court where the fine is not in excess of $100.

The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed. _

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bass v. State
221 S.W.2d 239 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Zummo v. State
175 S.W.2d 89 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Colf v. State
193 S.W. 148 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Cole v. State
81 Tex. Crim. 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Foard v. State
185 S.W. 570 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 S.W. 143, 79 Tex. Crim. 84, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grigsby-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.