Foard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Foard v. State

185 S.W. 570, 79 Tex. Crim. 330, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 130

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 5, 1916

DocketNo. 4029

StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.W. 570 (Foard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foard v. State, 185 S.W. 570, 79 Tex. Crim. 330, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 130 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

This cause originated and was tried in the Corporation Court of the City of San Antonio. It was appealed therefrom to the County Court, where a trial de novo occurred. The fine assessed was $100 even. This court, therefore, has no jurisdiction of this appeal, and the Assistant Attorney General’s motion to dismiss it is, therefore, granted. (Grigsby v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 84, 183 S. W. Rep., 143.)

The appeal is dismissed.

- ■ Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

This cause originated and was tried in the Corporation Court of the City of San Antonio. It was appealed therefrom to the County Court, where a trial de novo occurred. The fine assessed was $100 even. This court, therefore, has no jurisdiction of this appeal, and the Assistant Attorney General’s motion to dismiss it is, therefore, granted. (Grigsby v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 84, 183 S. W. Rep., 143.)

The appeal is dismissed.

- ■ Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.W. 570, 79 Tex. Crim. 330, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foard-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack