Griggs v. State

98 So. 490, 19 Ala. App. 517, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 303
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 18, 1923
Docket5 Div. 884.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 So. 490 (Griggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griggs v. State, 98 So. 490, 19 Ala. App. 517, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 303 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

On the trial the court, over ■ the objection and exception of defendant, admitted evidence' of facts tending to show vagrancy of defendant prior to the time covered by the indictment. This was error. The crime of vagrancy denounced by the statute, being a misdemeanor, is barred by the .limitation of one year, and acts tending to prove that defendant might have been convicted of vagrancy before that time are not admissible to prove that he was guilty within ■the period covered by the indictment. For

■ the errors of the court in admitting this character of evidence, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fiorella v. State
142 So. 2d 885 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 490, 19 Ala. App. 517, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griggs-v-state-alactapp-1923.