Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad

240 A.D. 845
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment dismissing the complaint and order in so far as it dismisses the complaint reversed on the law; order in so far as it sets aside the verdicts affirmed and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. The court had no power to dismiss the complaint after having denied a motion to dismiss it and after rendition of verdict. (Dougherty v. Salt, 227 N. Y. 200; Bail v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 201 id. 355.) Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs for reversal of the judgment dismissing the complaint and of the order in so far as it dismisses the complaint, but dissents as to the order in so far as it sets aside the verdicts, and votes for a reinstatement of the verdicts and judgment thereon in favor of plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad, 240 A.D. 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 845 (Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Di Stefano v. Anthony O'Boyle, Inc.
263 A.D. 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Richter
3 N.E.2d 408 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1936)
Rosenberg v. Syracuse Newspapers, Inc.
248 A.D. 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp.
241 A.D. 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)