Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp.

241 A.D. 880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order in so far as it dismisses the complaint and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law, motion to dismiss the complaint denied, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court had no power to dismiss the complaint after the rendering of the verdict where it had previously denied a motion to dismiss the complaint when both sides rested before the submission to the jury. (Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad Co., 240 App. Div. 845; Owens v. Jaller, Id. 856.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order in so far as it dismisses the complaint and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law, motion to dismiss the complaint denied, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court had no power to dismiss the complaint after the rendering of the verdict where it had previously denied a motion to dismiss the complaint when both sides rested before the submission to the jury. (Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad Co., 240 App. Div. 845; Owens v. Jaller, Id. 856.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp., 241 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 880 (Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related