Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp.
This text of 241 A.D. 880 (Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order in so far as it dismisses the complaint and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law, motion to dismiss the complaint denied, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court had no power to dismiss the complaint after the rendering of the verdict where it had previously denied a motion to dismiss the complaint when both sides rested before the submission to the jury. (Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad Co., 240 App. Div. 845; Owens v. Jaller, Id. 856.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freund-v-telmar-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1934.