Griffin v. United States

621 F.3d 1363, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20750, 2010 WL 3911319
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 7, 2010·No. 2009-5045·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

PLAGER, Circuit Judge, with whom NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, joins, responding to the decision of the court to deny panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

GAJARSA and LINN, Circuit Judges, dissent, without opinion, from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

Prior report: 590 F.3d 1291.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Plaintiff-Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Defendant-Appellee. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is OrdeRed That:

(1) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellant for panel rehearing is denied.

(2) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellant for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3)The mandate of the court will issue on October 14, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. United States, 621 F.3d 1363, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20750, 2010 WL 3911319 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

621 F.3d 1363 (Griffin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States
115 Fed. Cl. 116 (Federal Claims, 2014)
Jackson v. United States
107 Fed. Cl. 495 (Federal Claims, 2012)
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States
105 Fed. Cl. 37 (Federal Claims, 2012)
Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
103 Fed. Cl. 613 (Federal Claims, 2012)
Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. United States
102 Fed. Cl. 17 (Federal Claims, 2011)
Griffin v. United States
621 F.3d 1363 (Federal Circuit, 2010)