Griffin v. State

216 S.W.3d 714, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 437, 2007 WL 738675
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 272
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 2007·No. No. ED 88601·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Griffin (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 216 S.W.3d 714, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 437, 2007 WL 738675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

216 S.W.3d 714 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.