Griffin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Griffin v. State

134 S.W.3d 58, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 738, 2004 WL 1098943

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 272 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 2004·No. No. WD 62562·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Griffin appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, he sought to vacate his convictions for murder in the first degree, section 565.020, RSMo 2000; armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000; and robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole, thirty years, and ten years imprisonment, respectively. On appeal, Mr. Griffin claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Griffin appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, he sought to vacate his convictions for murder in the first degree, section 565.020, RSMo 2000; armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 2000; and robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole, thirty years, and ten years imprisonment, respectively. On appeal, Mr. Griffin claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Griffin v. State, 134 S.W.3d 58, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 738, 2004 WL 1098943 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

134 S.W.3d 58 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.