Griffin v. State
780 S.W.2d 109, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1573, 1989 WL 134225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 200 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griffin v. State, 780 S.W.2d 109, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1573, 1989 WL 134225 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
780 S.W.2d 109 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.