Griffin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Griffin v. State

780 S.W.2d 68, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1433, 1989 WL 118670

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 200 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 1989·No. No. 55465·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court’s order as mov-ant has failed to show that the findings, conclusions and judgment were clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). Because it would serve no precedential purpose, we affirm the order without written opinion under Rule 84.16(b). However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court’s order as mov-ant has failed to show that the findings, conclusions and judgment were clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). Because it would serve no precedential purpose, we affirm the order without written opinion under Rule 84.16(b). However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

Griffin v. State, 780 S.W.2d 68, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1433, 1989 WL 118670 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

780 S.W.2d 68 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.