Griffin v. State

129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 186
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1925·No. 16611·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

1. Upon the hearing of a motion to arrest the judgment in a criminal case the court looks only at the indictment and the verdict, the presumption being that the evidence authorized the verdict. Watson v. State, 116 Ga. 607 (6) (43 S. E. 32).

2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the court properly struck from the motion in arrest of judgment matter that was extrinsic to the face of the record, and properly repelled evidence which showed facts not appearing on the face of the record, and properly overruled the motion to arrest the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Blood/wortli, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

129 S.E. 666 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Register v. State
15 S.E.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)