Griffin Grocery Co. v. Reeves

56 S.E. 751, 127 Ga. 669, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 16, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

(After stating the facts.) The battle before the jury was fought on the plea of payment. On this plea the evidence was conflicting, but was sufficient to uphold this defense. There was no evidence to the effect that the drawee bank had failed before presentation of the checks. On the contrary, it was undisputed that the bank continued business for some ten days subsequent to the time when the plaintiff contended it presented the cheeks for payment and payment was refused, and the time when the defendant contended the checks were actually paid. Under the circumstances of this ease it is not reasonable to suppose that the jury was confused or misled by the charge complained of in [672]*672the motion, and set out in the statement of facts. The verdict is-approved by the trial judge, is supported by evidence, and should not be vacated because of an inapplicable instruction which most probably did not affect their finding.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J.„ absent, and Beck, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin Grocery Co. v. Reeves, 56 S.E. 751, 127 Ga. 669, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 454 (Ga. 1907).

56 S.E. 751 (Griffin Grocery Co. v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Transportation v. Delta MacHine Products Co.
278 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
General GMC Trucks, Inc. v. Crockett
244 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Dalton v. State
194 S.E.2d 268 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)