Grievance Administrator v. Holt

587 N.W.2d 283, 459 Mich. 1220
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1998
DocketNo. 111460
StatusPublished

This text of 587 N.W.2d 283 (Grievance Administrator v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grievance Administrator v. Holt, 587 N.W.2d 283, 459 Mich. 1220 (Mich. 1998).

Opinion

Proposed Amendments op MCR 2.403, 2.405, 7.203, and 7.208. On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering proposed amendments to Michigan Court Rules 2.403, 2.405, 7.203, and 7.208. As explained in the Staff Comment following the rules, alternative language is proposed dealing with two separate issues. Before determining whether the proposals should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford any interested person the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposals. We welcome the views of all who wish to address the proposals or who wish to suggest alternatives.

[The present language would be amended as indicated below:]

Rule 2.403. Mediation.

(A)-(N) [Unchanged.]

(O) Rejecting Party’s Liability for Costs.

(1>(7) [Unchanged.]

(8) A request for costs under this subrule must be filed and served within 28 days after the entry of the judgment or entry of an order denying a timely motion for a new trial or to set aside the judgment. The trial court shall not hear or rule on the request while an appeal of right or by leave granted is pending.

(9) -(ll) [Unchanged.]

(P) Appeals. If an appeal by right or by leave granted is pending, a postiudgment order granting or denying attorney fees and costs under MCR 2.403 or 2,405 is appealable as follows:

[1221]*1221(1) If the time period for filing the appellant’s brief under MCR 7.212fA)fl)fa)fiii) has not begun to run, the appellant may file with the Court of Appeals a copy of the order and a notice that issues regarding the order will be included in the appeal.

(Z) If the time period for filing the appellant’s brief under MCR 7.212fA)fDfa)(iii) has begun to run, or if the appellee seeks to appeal the order, an application for leave to appeal must be filed. However, the Court of Appeals shall grant the application and consolidate the appeals unless the pending appeal has progressed to the point where it would be impractical to consolidate.

Rule 2.405. Offers to Stipulate to Entry of Judgment.

(A)-(E) [Unchanged.]

(F) Appeals. MCR 2.403CP) applies to appeals from orders awarding or denying costs under this rule.

Rule 7.203. Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals.

(A) Appeal of Right. The court has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from the following:

(l)-(3) [Unchanged.]

(4) An order awarding or denying attorney fees and costs under MCR 2.403 or MCR 2.405.

(B) -(E) [Unchanged.]

Rule 7.208. Authority of Court or Tribunal Appealed From.

(A)-(H) [Unchanged.]

(I) Attorney Fees and Costs. The trial court may rule on requests for costs or attorney fees under MCR 2.403, 2.405, 2,625 or other law or court rule, unless the Court of Appeals orders otherwise.

Staff Comment: The proposed amendments of MCR 2.403, 2.405, 7.203, and 7.208 deal with two separate issues regarding the relationship of appeals and orders awarding or denying sanctions under the mediation and offer of judgment rules. As to each issue, alternative proposals are presented.

The first issue concerns the authority of the trial court to rule on requests for sanctions when an appeal has been taken. See Co-Jo, Inc v Strand, 226 Mich App 108 (1997). The first alternative would add a new MCR 7.208(1) to provide that the trial court has the authority to rule on such requests despite the pendency of an appeal. The second alternative would add language to MCR 2.403(0) (8) providing that the trial court could not hear or rule on such requests while the appeal is pending.

The second issue involves the appealability of orders awarding or denying sanctions. One proposal would amend MCR 7.203 to make such orders appealable by right. The other would add a new MCR 2.403(P) (and a cross-reference to it in MCR 2.405) to create a procedure for adding issues regarding such orders to pending appeals.

The staff comment is published only for the benefit of the bench and bar and is not an authoritative construction by the Court.

[1222]*1222Publication of these proposals does not mean that the Court will issue an order on the subject, nor does it imply probable adoption in its present form. Timely comments will be substantively considered and your assistance is appreciated by the Court.

A copy of this order will be given to the secretary of the State Bar and to the State Court Administrator so that they can make the notifications specified in MCR 1.201. Comments on the proposals may be sent to the Supreme Court Clerk within 60 days after they are published in the Michigan Bar Journal. When submitting a comment, please refer to our file number 98-17.

Proposed Amendments of MCR 7.201, 7.202, 7.203, 7.210, 7.212, 7.215, 7.217, and 8.105. On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering proposed amendments to Michigan Court Rules 7.201, 7.202, 7.203, 7.210, 7.212, 7.215, 7.217, and 8.105. Before determining whether the proposals should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford any interested person the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposals. We welcome the views of all who wish to address the proposals or who wish to suggest alternatives.

Rule 7.201. Organization and Operation of Court of Appeals.

(A) [Unchanged.]

(B) Court of Appeals Clerk; Place of Filing Papers; Fees.

(1>(2) [Unchanged.]

(3) If a case is accepted for filing without all of the required documents, transcripts, or fees, the appellant, or the plaintiff in an original action under MCR 7.206, must supply the missing items within _21 days after the date of the clerk’s notice of deficiency. The chief judge or another designated judge may dismiss the appeal and assess costs if the deficiency is not remedied within that time.

(C) -(H) [Unchanged.]

Rule 7.202. Definitions.

For purposes of this subchapter:

(l)-(5) [Unchanged.]

(6) “signcd^^mcans the original signature (facsimile signature ia not per mitted) of the attomoy-for-a party or the signature of a party-proceeding on the party’s own behalf;

(6)-(7) [Formerly (7)-(8), redesignated, but otherwise unchanged.]

(F) Dismissal.

[1223]*1223111 The chief judge or another designated judge may, acting alone, dismiss an appeal or original proceeding for lack of .jurisdiction.

(2j The appellant or plaintiff may file a motion for reconsideration within 21 days after the date of the order of dismissal. The motion shall be submitted to a panel of 3 judges. No entry fee is required for a motion filed under this subrule.

(31 The clerk will not accept for filing a motion for rehearing of an order issued by a 3-judge panel that denies a motion for reconsideration filed under subrule (21.

Rule 7.210. Record on Appeal.

(Aj-(G) [Unchanged.]

(HI Transmission of Record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Co-Jo, Inc v. Strand
572 N.W.2d 251 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 N.W.2d 283, 459 Mich. 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grievance-administrator-v-holt-mich-1998.