Grey v. Fischer

63 A.D.3d 1431, 882 N.Y.S.2d 322
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 63 A.D.3d 1431 (Grey v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grey v. Fischer, 63 A.D.3d 1431, 882 N.Y.S.2d 322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Stein, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cahill, J.), entered July 3, 2008 in Albany County, which [1432]*1432granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of the Department of Correctional Services calculating petitioner’s sentences as running consecutively.

In 1987, petitioner was sentenced to IV2 to 472 years in prison upon his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree. Petitioner was paroled, committed additional crimes and, in 1989, was sentenced for those crimes as a second violent felony offender to various prison terms, resulting in an aggregate prison term of 15 to 30 years. The 1989 sentencing minutes were silent as to the manner in which such sentences were to run relative to the undischarged portion of petitioner’s 1987 sentence.1

The Department of Correctional Services (hereinafter DOCS), relying upon Penal Law § 70.25 (2-a), calculated petitioner’s sentences as running consecutively, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul that determination. Supreme Court granted petitioner’s application and annulled DOCS’s consecutive sentencing determination, prompting this appeal.2

Subsequent to Supreme Court’s determination, the Court of Appeals ruled that where, as here, the sentencing court is required to impose a consecutive sentence (see Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a]), “it is deemed to have imposed the consecutive sentence the law requires” (People ex rel. Gill v Greene, 12 NY3d 1, 4 [2009])—even in the absence of an express judicial directive to that effect (see id. at 6). Inasmuch as there is no dispute that petitioner was subject to the consecutive sentencing provisions of Penal Law § 70.25 (2-a), we perceive no error in DOCS’s computation of his sentence (see People ex rel. Taylor v Brown, 62 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2009]; Matter of McMoore v Fischer, 61 AD3d 1187, 1188 [2009]). Accordingly, Supreme Court’s judgment is reversed and the petition is dismissed.

Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Baker v. Behrle
69 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Caban v. Fischer
68 A.D.3d 1405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Whidbee v. Rivera
67 A.D.3d 1261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Meade v. Boucaud
67 A.D.3d 1263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Campney v. Yelich
67 A.D.3d 1305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Catts v. Haggett
67 A.D.3d 1315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Abrams v. Fischer
67 A.D.3d 1320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Dalton v. James
66 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Livingston v. James
66 A.D.3d 1096 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Gannon v. Sears
66 A.D.3d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Kirkland v. Artus
66 A.D.3d 1101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Hughes v. Yelich
66 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Tucker v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
66 A.D.3d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Hunt v. Fischer
66 A.D.3d 1105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Brown v. Boucaud
66 A.D.3d 1109 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Blake v. Smith
66 A.D.3d 1074 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Holliman v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
66 A.D.3d 1075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Miller v. LaClair
66 A.D.3d 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Knight v. Napoli
66 A.D.3d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Tomon v. Yelich
66 A.D.3d 1078 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.3d 1431, 882 N.Y.S.2d 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grey-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2009.