Gregory Bernard Bolden, II v. Warden Jacob Beasley, Assistant Warden Carver, Sergeant Dassious, Officer Lupo, and Deputy Warden Folks

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

GREGORY BERNARD BOLDEN, II, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:24-cv-70 v. WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, ASSISTANT WARDEN CARVER, SERGEANT DASSIOUS, OFFICER LUPO, and DEPUTY WARDEN FOLKS, Defendants.

ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation for the Court to grant as unopposed Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint based on his failure to follow this Court’s Orders and failure to prosecute. Doc. 46. Plaintiff did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, upon review, I find no clear error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and ADOPT the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (If no specific objections are made or no objections are made at all, “the appropriate standard of review for the report and recommendation is clear error.”). I GRANT as unopposed Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, doc. 30, and DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint, doc. 1, for failure to follow this Court’s Orders and failure to prosecute. | DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and

enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. ph SO ORDERED, this__//” ‘day of December, 2025.

“UAB _ HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT “SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA