Greenway v. Greenway

Supreme Court of Georgia

Greenway v. Greenway

87 S.E. 398, 144 Ga. 488, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 649

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Greenway v. Greenway. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 Ga. 503 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1915·Published

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. From the meager statement of the contents of the record which was admitted in evidence over objection, it can not be held that this ruling was error. When taken in connection with the other evidence, the relevancy of the record thus admitted may be inferred.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

1. From the meager statement of the contents of the record which was admitted in evidence over objection, it can not be held that this ruling was error. When taken in connection with the other evidence, the relevancy of the record thus admitted may be inferred.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Greenway v. Greenway, 87 S.E. 398, 144 Ga. 488, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 649 (Ga. 1915).

Pincite

87 S.E. 398 (Greenway v. Greenway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.