Greenwald v. Geller

162 A. 899, 109 N.J.L. 549, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 162 A. 899 (Greenwald v. Geller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greenwald v. Geller, 162 A. 899, 109 N.J.L. 549, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 416 (N.J. 1932).

Opinion

The facts and questions of law involved are fully stated in theper curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. That opinion makes a slight misstatement of fact which, however, is quite immaterial to the decision, the statement being that the plaintiff was entering the premises in question, whereas the testimony indicates that she was leaving them. This, of course, makes no difference in the result as the principles of law applicable are precisely the same.

The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None. *Page 550

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A. 899, 109 N.J.L. 549, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenwald-v-geller-nj-1932.