Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A.

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided August 13, 2025·No. SCWC-20-0000557·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 13-AUG-2025 02:04 PM Dkt. 29 ODMR

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________

MICHAEL C. GREENSPON, Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CIT BANK, N.A. f/k/a ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Respondent and Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee,

and

DAVID B. ROSEN, ESQ. and THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID B. ROSEN, ALC, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2CC1410000379(1))

ORDER DENYING MOTION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner and Respondent/

Plaintiff-Appellant’s Motion to Set Aside Summary Disposition

Order and Remand This Case for Trial on the Merits filed on

August 8, 2025 (Dkt. 27), which this court construes as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 40(b), and the record herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, August 13, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., (haw 2025).

Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. (Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.