Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A.
This text of Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. (Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-APR-2025 09:24 AM Dkt. 23 OGAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
MICHAEL C. GREENSPON, Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CIT BANK, N.A. f/k/a ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Respondent and Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee,
and
DAVID B. ROSEN, ESQ. and THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID B. ROSEN, ALC, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2CC1410000379)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant Michael
C. Greenspon’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on
February 18, 2025, (Dkt. 1), and Respondent and
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company,
successor by merger to CIT Bank, N.A., f/k/a OneWest Bank N.A., f/k/a OneWest Bank N.A., FSB’s Application for Writ of Certiorari,
filed on February 21, 2025, (Dkt. 5), are hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
held in this case, subject to further order of the court. Any
party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the
Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral
argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, April 16, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greenspon-v-cit-bank-na-haw-2025.