Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A.

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 2025·No. SCWC-20-0000557·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 16-APR-2025 09:24 AM Dkt. 23 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

MICHAEL C. GREENSPON, Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CIT BANK, N.A. f/k/a ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Respondent and Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee,

and

DAVID B. ROSEN, ESQ. and THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID B. ROSEN, ALC, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2CC1410000379)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant Michael

C. Greenspon’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on

February 18, 2025, (Dkt. 1), and Respondent and

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company,

successor by merger to CIT Bank, N.A., f/k/a OneWest Bank N.A., f/k/a OneWest Bank N.A., FSB’s Application for Writ of Certiorari,

filed on February 21, 2025, (Dkt. 5), are hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

held in this case, subject to further order of the court. Any

party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the

Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral

argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, April 16, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A., (haw 2025).

Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A. (Greenspon v. CIT Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.