Greenleaf v. Kellogg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Greenleaf v. Kellogg

2 Mass. 568

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1803·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s counsel stated that the defence relied on was, that no action is maintainable on such a note as this until after the principal sum should fall due. But the Court were decidedly of opinion that such a defence was insufficient, and gave judgment for the interest in arrear, and for the interest of each year’s interest, from the day it was payable to the time of rendering the judgment.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s counsel stated that the defence relied on was, that no action is maintainable on such a note as this until after the principal sum should fall due. But the Court were decidedly of opinion that such a defence was insufficient, and gave judgment for the interest in arrear, and for the interest of each year’s interest, from the day it was payable to the time of rendering the judgment.

Footnotes

Greenleaf v. Kellogg, 2 Mass. 568 (Mass. 1803).

Pincite

2 Mass. 568 (Greenleaf v. Kellogg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related