Cooley v. Rose
3 Mass. 221
Opinion
Ashman being about to argue, in support of the demurrer, that [191] no action would lie in this case for the interest, until the principal. became due; the Court suggested to him that the point had been settled otherwise in several instances. He * said [ * 222 ] that, not having known that there had been any solemn decision in this Court, he had relied on the authorities in the books; out, upon this suggestion, he declined going into the question
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooley v. Rose, 3 Mass. 221 (Mass. 1807).
3 Mass. 221 (Cooley v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phelps v. Shawprint, Inc.
103 N.E.2d 687 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1952)
Hodge v. Wallace
108 N.W. 212 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
Colwell v. Fulton
117 F. 931 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, 1902)
Doe v. Vallejo
29 Cal. 385 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
Ferry v. Ferry
56 Mass. 92 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1848)
Hollingsworth v. Detroit
12 F. Cas. 352 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1844)
Howe v. Bradley
19 Me. 31 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1841)
Jewett v. Town of Alton
7 N.H. 253 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1834)
Watkinson v. Root
4 Ohio 341 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1829)
Greenleaf v. Kellogg
2 Mass. 568 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1803)