Cooley v. Rose
This text of 3 Mass. 221 (Cooley v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ashman being about to argue, in support of the demurrer, that [191]*191no action would lie in this case for the interest, until the principal. became due; the Court suggested to him that the point had been settled otherwise in several instances. He * said [ * 222 ] that, not having known that there had been any solemn decision in this Court, he had relied on the authorities in the books; out, upon this suggestion, he declined going into the question
jDeclaration adjudged good.
[Hastings vs. Wiswall, 8 Mass. 455.—Stearns & Al. vs. Brown Ux., 1 Pick, 30.—Tucker vs. Randall, 2 Mass. 283.—Estabrook vs. Moulton, 9 Mass. 258.—Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Mass. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooley-v-rose-mass-1807.