Greenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

411 N.E.2d 784, 51 N.Y.2d 745, 432 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2607
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 1980·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal and conditional cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed, each upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754; Walker v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 36 NY2d 695).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 411 N.E.2d 784, 51 N.Y.2d 745, 432 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2607 (N.Y. 1980).

411 N.E.2d 784 (Greenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
325 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Lizza Industries, Inc. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
329 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)