Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

582 F. App'x 246
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2014·No. No. 14-1199·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shirley, Ralph, and Antionette Green appeal the district court’s orders granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motions to dismiss their fraud, promissory estoppel, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 13-101 et seq., claims against it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 927 F.Supp.2d 244 (D.Md.2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 582 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2014).

582 F. App'x 246 (Green v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related