Green v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Green v. United States

101 F. App'x 929

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 1, 2004

Docket04-6508

StatusUnpublished

This text of 101 F. App'x 929 (Green v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. United States, 101 F. App'x 929 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2000). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Green v. United States, No. CA-03-269-1 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2000). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Green v. United States, No. CA-03-269-1 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 F. App'x 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-united-states-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack