Green v. Sumter Court

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1735

TIMOTHY E. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUMTER COURT; TUOMEY HOSPITAL; HARRY LEA KIRBY; HOUSING AUTHORITY; SOCIAL SECURITY; CONGRESS; FREEDOM HOUSING; HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT; WATER DEPARTMENT; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, Defendants - Appellees, and

ALFRED QUIMET; ROBERT MCCABE; MOTOR VEHICLE; HEARING FREEDOM HOUSING; TB DRUG AND ALCOHOL; TB HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT; HE BILL VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; EDUCATION; OVERPAYMENT BACK PAYMENT; LEGAL RIGHTS, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-01570-JFA)

Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy E. Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Green seeks to appeal the district court’s

order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate and dismissing

without prejudice his pro se civil action. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Green seeks to appeal is not

an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th

Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -