Green v. Sumter Court

241 F. App'x 956
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2007·No. No. 07-1735·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate and dismissing without prejudice his pro se civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Green seeks to appeal is not an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Sumter Court, 241 F. App'x 956 (4th Cir. 2007).

241 F. App'x 956 (Green v. Sumter Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related