Green v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Green v. State

70 S.E. 26, 8 Ga. App. 574, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 58

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Ga. App. 260 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 24, 1911·No. 2694·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

The case hinged on the identity of a hog, white and black spotted, which the defendant insisted was his, and' the evidence seems to us to preponderate in his favor. But the prosecutor swore that it was his (the prosecutor’s), and the jury believed the prosecutor’s testimony. No error of law is assigned, and this court has no power to set aside a verdict where a question of fact is the only issue involved.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

The case hinged on the identity of a hog, white and black spotted, which the defendant insisted was his, and' the evidence seems to us to preponderate in his favor. But the prosecutor swore that it was his (the prosecutor’s), and the jury believed the prosecutor’s testimony. No error of law is assigned, and this court has no power to set aside a verdict where a question of fact is the only issue involved.

Judgment affirmed.

Green v. State, 70 S.E. 26, 8 Ga. App. 574, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 58 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

70 S.E. 26 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.