Green v. State

65 S.E. 802, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Ga. App. 260
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 13, 1909·No. 2059·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial rests chiefly on the ground of newly discovered testimony. The fact testified to by the newly discovered witness was insisted upon at the trial, by the defendant in his statement, but he had no witness to the fact. The affidavits make a prima facie ease as to the movant’s diligence; and in the facts of the transaction there is nothing inconsistent with the view, sustained by his affidavits, that he could not have discoyered the existence of this witness by-ordinary diligence. The character of the new witness is duly substantiated. There was no counter-showing. ' This court is of the opinion that the interests of justice can best be subserved through a new investigation. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 65 S.E. 802, 6 Ga. App. 784, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 463 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

65 S.E. 802 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.