Green v. State
849 So. 2d 1089, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4763, 2003 WL 1824603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10915 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996)(peremptory challenges are presumed non-discriminatory and trial court’s findings will be affirmed absent clear error); Amazon v. State, 487 So.2d 8 (Fla.1986) (Juror’s comment to another juror that a witness’ testimony was impressive did not show that juror had developed a premature opinion on case).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. State, 849 So. 2d 1089, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4763, 2003 WL 1824603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
849 So. 2d 1089 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Amazon v. State
487 So. 2d 8 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)