Green v. State
765 So. 2d 982, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11331, 2000 WL 1258292
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 728 So. 2d 779 →
Opinion
We reverse the order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The state agrees that appellant’s offense was committed within the window period during which the 1995 amendments to the sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional. Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). On remand, the trial court shall determine whether resentencing is required. See Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. State, 765 So. 2d 982, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11331, 2000 WL 1258292 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
765 So. 2d 982 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Speed v. State
764 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)