Green v. State

732 So. 2d 484, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6767, 1999 WL 330734
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 So. 2d 502
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1999·No. No. 99-00459·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edmond Green appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his collateral motion attacking his sentence. Green was erroneously sentenced as a habitual felony offender, and his sentence is illegal and may be corrected by way of motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Young v. State, 716 So.2d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse.

All of Green’s prior qualifying felony convictions were for violations of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1993), relating to the purchase or possession of controlled substances. Consequently, Green did not qualify for a habitual offender sentence. See § 775.084(l)(a)3, Fla. Stat. (1993). Upon remand, Green should be sentenced according to the applicable guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 732 So. 2d 484, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6767, 1999 WL 330734 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

732 So. 2d 484 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. State
716 So. 2d 280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)