Green v. State

681 So. 2d 1215, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1996 WL 631702
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1996·No. No. 96-1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the appeal of the summary denial of a Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief on multiple grounds. The appeal would have been untimely, but the state concedes that because the lower court failed to inform appellant in writing of his right to appeal within thirty days, the appeal must be treated as timely. The state also concedes that claims one and two of appellant’s motion were legally sufficient and could not be summarily denied without record support. We agree that the lower court has failed to do its work on this Rule 3.850 motion and, accordingly, we reverse and remand.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 681 So. 2d 1215, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1996 WL 631702 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 1215 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunbar v. State
688 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)