Green v. State

151 So. 898, 113 Fla. 237, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1720
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 11, 1933·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the .Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen *238 and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 151 So. 898, 113 Fla. 237, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1720 (Fla. 1933).

151 So. 898 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of M. E.
357 So. 2d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
State v. Mitchell
347 So. 2d 610 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Mitchell v. State
333 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Sifford v. State
202 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Coats v. State
195 So. 2d 40 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Jones v. State
192 So. 2d 285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Young v. State
162 So. 2d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Channell v. State
107 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)