Green v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Green v. State

153 So. 920, 26 Ala. App. 644

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 1934

Docket8 Div. 863.

StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 920 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. State, 153 So. 920, 26 Ala. App. 644 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This appellant, defendant in the court below, was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of grand larceny; the specific charge being that he feloniously took and carried away from the person of Sidney Ikard, one $10 bill, four $5 bills, three $1 bills, lawful money of the United States of America, the personal property of Sidney Ikard. The court duly sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than nine years or more than ten years. Erom the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken.

There is no' bill of exceptions in the transcript ; the appeal being rested upon the record proper. The question of the regularity of the record only is pz-esented. Upon examination we find no error apparent upon the record ; hence the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This appellant, defendant in the court below, was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of grand larceny; the specific charge being that he feloniously took and carried away from the person of Sidney Ikard, one $10 bill, four $5 bills, three $1 bills, lawful money of the United States of America, the personal property of Sidney Ikard. The court duly sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than nine years or more than ten years. Erom the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken.

There is no' bill of exceptions in the transcript ; the appeal being rested upon the record proper. The question of the regularity of the record only is pz-esented. Upon examination we find no error apparent upon the record ; hence the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 So. 920, 26 Ala. App. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-alactapp-1934.