Green v. State

141 So. 727, 25 Ala. App. 125, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 117
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 235
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 1932·No. 6 Div. 150.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was charged with, and convicted of, tbe offense of robbery, in that he *126 feloniously took $35, the property of Sam Naro, from his person, and against his will, by violence to his person, or by putting him in such fear as unwillingly to part with the same. The jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of twenty years. Judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered. From Said judgment, this appeal was taken.

Insistences of error are predicated upon the refusal by the trial court to give several special charges, requested in writing, and on the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. As to these points of decision, we are without authority to consider them. There is no bill of exceptions in the transcript, in the absence of which this court cannot review the rulings of the lower court upon the matters here complained of. This results upon the appeal here being conhned to the record proper. The record being regular in all things and without error, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 141 So. 727, 25 Ala. App. 125, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 117 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

141 So. 727 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.