Green v. Hanson
This text of 62 N.W. 408 (Green v. Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contract to move the buildings was entire, and the plaintiff could not recover upon it without fully completing it, unless full performance was excused or prevented by the defendant. Whether the defendant did prevent the plaintiff from completing the contract was the question litigated, and upon that question the evidence was conflicting. No errors in the rulings upon testimony are claimed. The jury found, upon sufficient evidence, that the defendant did prevent the full performance of the contract.
There are no exceptions to the charge, save a general exception to the entire charge. This is of no avail when any part of the charge is correct, and there can be no doubt as to the correctness of the greater part of the charge.
By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 N.W. 408, 89 Wis. 597, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-hanson-wis-1895.