Green v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
This text of 69 F. App'x 363 (Green v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bliss H. Green appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of the Racketeer Influ[364]*364enced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 and violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. City of Lodi, 302 F.3d 928, 939 (9th Cir.2002), cert denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1754, 155 L.Ed.2d 512 (2003), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s February 25, 2002, order.
Because Green failed to demonstrate any basis for relief from judgment, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motions for reconsideration. See School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir.1993).
We reject Green’s remaining contentions.
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-burlington-northern-santa-fe-railway-co-ca9-2003.