Greathouse v. Comerica Bank
This text of Greathouse v. Comerica Bank (Greathouse v. Comerica Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO TERRY GREATHOUSE, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:24-cv- 1030 DLM/JFR COMERICA BANK, Defendant. ORDER SETTING NEW TRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte under the Court’s inherent power to manage its docket. See Bunn v. Perdue, 966 F.3d 1094, 1099 (10th Cir. 2020) (“District courts are afforded great discretion regarding control of the docket and parties.”) (quoting United States v. Orozco, 916 F.3d 919, 925 (10th Cir. 2019)); SEC v. Mgmt. Sols., Inc., 824 F. App’x 550, 553 (10th Cir. 2020) (‘[A] district court has the inherent power to ‘manage [its] own affairs so as to achieve orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’”) (quoting Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 45 (2016)). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the previously scheduled trial scheduling conference. In its place, the Court will conduct a telephonic trial scheduling conference on January 15, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. MST. Counsel and pro se parties shall call 855-244-8681 and enter access code 2314 983 7724 to be connected to the telephonic status conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. . Zz pews Z Meg DAMIANL.MARTINEZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Greathouse v. Comerica Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greathouse-v-comerica-bank-nmd-2025.