Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson

45 S.W.2d 554
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 6, 1932·No. Motion No. 9935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The relator has a complete remedy secured by writ of error by articles 1$21 and 1728, Rev. Stat. Mandamus will no longer lie to require the Court of Civil Appeals to certify the question of conflict in this character of case; the former practice was based on the absence of such remedy. International & G. N. R. Co. v. Pleasants, 116 Tex. 568, 296 S. W. 282.

The motion for leave to file petition for mandamus is therefore refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson, 45 S.W.2d 554 (Tex. 1932).

45 S.W.2d 554 (Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International & Great Northern Railroad v. Pleasants
296 S.W. 282 (Texas Supreme Court, 1927)