Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson

45 S.W.2d 554, 121 Tex. 127, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 100
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 6, 1932·No. Motion No. 9935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The relators have a complete remedy secured by writ of error by articles 1821 and 1728, Rev. Stats. Mandamus will no longer lie to require the Court of Civil Appeals to certify the question of conflict in this character of case; the former practice was based on the absence of such remedy. International & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Pleasants, 116 Texas, 568.

The motion for leave to file the petition for mandamus is therefore refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson, 45 S.W.2d 554, 121 Tex. 127, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 100 (Tex. 1932).

45 S.W.2d 554 (Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International & Great Northern Railroad v. Pleasants
296 S.W. 282 (Texas Supreme Court, 1927)