Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson

Texas Supreme Court

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson

45 S.W.2d 554, 121 Tex. 127, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 100

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 6, 1932

DocketMotion No. 9935

StatusPublished

This text of 45 S.W.2d 554 (Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Willson, 45 S.W.2d 554, 121 Tex. 127, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 100 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The relators have a complete remedy secured by writ of error by articles 1821 and 1728, Rev. Stats. Mandamus will no longer lie to require the Court of Civil Appeals to certify the question of conflict in this character of case; the former practice was based on the absence of such remedy. International & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Pleasants, 116 Texas, 568.

The motion for leave to file the petition for mandamus is therefore refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The relators have a complete remedy secured by writ of error by articles 1821 and 1728, Rev. Stats. Mandamus will no longer lie to require the Court of Civil Appeals to certify the question of conflict in this character of case; the former practice was based on the absence of such remedy. International & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Pleasants, 116 Texas, 568.

The motion for leave to file the petition for mandamus is therefore refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 S.W.2d 554, 121 Tex. 127, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-v-willson-tex-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack