Grayson v. Beardsley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Grayson v. Beardsley

1930 OK 177, 287 P. 73, 143 Okla. 28, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 534

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grayson v. Beardsley. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Okla. 139 →

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 15, 1930·No. 20279·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case of Sally Nichols, nee -Grayson, v. D. Beardsley and F. M. Coonrod, defendants in error, this day decided, presents a statement of facts, except as to parties, the same as the facts involved in this appeal. The rules announced in that case are controlling and operate to cause a dismissal of this appeal.

This appeal is therefore dismissed.

Note. — See “Appeal and Error,” 3 C. J. §986, p. 1023, n. 53; 4 C. J. §2541, p. 649, n. 35.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The case of Sally Nichols, nee -Grayson, v. D. Beardsley and F. M. Coonrod, defendants in error, this day decided, presents a statement of facts, except as to parties, the same as the facts involved in this appeal. The rules announced in that case are controlling and operate to cause a dismissal of this appeal.

This appeal is therefore dismissed.

Note. — See “Appeal and Error,” 3 C. J. §986, p. 1023, n. 53; 4 C. J. §2541, p. 649, n. 35.

Grayson v. Beardsley, 1930 OK 177, 287 P. 73, 143 Okla. 28, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 534 (Okla. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK 177 (Grayson v. Beardsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.