Grayson v. Beardsley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Grayson v. Beardsley

1928 OK 699, 272 P. 447, 134 Okla. 139, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 822

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 4, 1928

Docket19711

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1928 OK 699 (Grayson v. Beardsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grayson v. Beardsley, 1928 OK 699, 272 P. 447, 134 Okla. 139, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 822 (Okla. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

The case of Sallie Nichols, nee Grayson, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. Beardsley and F. M. Coonrod, Defendants in Error, this day decided, 134 Okla. 139, 272 Pac. 447, presents a statement of facts, except as to parties, the same as the facts involy’ed in this appeal. The rule announced in that case is controlling and operates to cause a dismissal of this appeal. Therefore the appeal in this cause is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.'

The case of Sallie Nichols, nee Grayson, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. Beardsley and F. M. Coonrod, Defendants in Error, this day decided, 134 Okla. 139, 272 Pac. 447, presents a statement of facts, except as to parties, the same as the facts involy’ed in this appeal. The rule announced in that case is controlling and operates to cause a dismissal of this appeal. Therefore the appeal in this cause is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1928 OK 699, 272 P. 447, 134 Okla. 139, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayson-v-beardsley-okla-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack