Grayer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grayer v. State

214 So. 2d 765, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5044

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 1968·No. No. 67-898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. One, (as amended, January 1, 1968, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure No. 1.-850, 33 F.S.A.)

• Appellant contends that (1) he was coerced by his court appointed attorney and the state attorney into pleading guilty to the crime of rape and (2) his court appointed attorney was incompetent.

We have carefully considered the briefs and record on appeal and have concluded that appellant’s contentions are without merit. Fields v. State, Fla.App.1966, 202 So.2d 226; Smith v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 192 So.2d 41; Bryant v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 41.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. One, (as amended, January 1, 1968, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure No. 1.-850, 33 F.S.A.)

• Appellant contends that (1) he was coerced by his court appointed attorney and the state attorney into pleading guilty to the crime of rape and (2) his court appointed attorney was incompetent.

We have carefully considered the briefs and record on appeal and have concluded that appellant’s contentions are without merit. Fields v. State, Fla.App.1966, 202 So.2d 226; Smith v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 192 So.2d 41; Bryant v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 41.

Affirmed.

Grayer v. State, 214 So. 2d 765, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

214 So. 2d 765 (Grayer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related