Fields v. State
202 So. 2d 226
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 1967·No. No. 66-1004·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
This appeal is from a summary denial of appellant’s petition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule I, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. It affirmatively appears from the record presented that the petition was properly denied by the trial court because the court will not consider successive petitions based upon the same ground. See Smith v. State, Fla. App.1965, 180 So.2d 675; Whitney v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 184 So.2d 207.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fields v. State, 202 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
202 So. 2d 226 (Fields v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Browning v. State
307 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Tucker v. State
286 So. 2d 607 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Grant v. State
224 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Riley v. State
214 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Grayer v. State
214 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Bobby Jones Garden Apts., Inc. v. Connecticut Mut. L. Ins. Co.
202 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)