Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

60 N.E.2d 849, 294 N.Y. 701, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 904
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 8, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.E.2d 849 (Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 60 N.E.2d 849, 294 N.Y. 701, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 904 (N.Y. 1945).

Opinion

Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended so as to provide that the motion of defendant be granted on the merits and that final judgment on the merits be entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. [See 292 N. Y. 246.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
54 N.E.2d 811 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.E.2d 849, 294 N.Y. 701, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graybar-electric-co-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-ny-1945.