Graybar Electric Co. v. Curry
308 U.S. 513, 60 S. Ct. 139
Opinion
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Banker Bros. v. Pennsylvania, 222 U. S. 210; Wiloil Corporation v. Pennsylvania, 294 U. S. 169.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graybar Electric Co. v. Curry, 308 U.S. 513, 60 S. Ct. 139 (1939).
308 U.S. 513 (Graybar Electric Co. v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michigan National Bank v. Department of Treasury
127 Mich. App. 646 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1983)
W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. National Restaurant Supply Co.
511 P.2d 363 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1973)
Central Transportation Company v. Atkins
305 S.W.2d 940 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1957)
Dorsett v. Overstreet
18 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Ayrshire Patoka Collieries Corp. v. Nudelman
50 N.E.2d 509 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1943)
Standard Oil Co. v. Department of Finance
48 N.E.2d 514 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1943)
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. State Commission of Revenue & Taxation
138 P.2d 1008 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1943)
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Johnson
119 P.2d 945 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
Nelson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
312 U.S. 359 (Supreme Court, 1941)
McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.
309 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1940)