Gray v. Thompson

1 Johns. Ch. 82
New York Court of Chancery·Decided June 2, 1814·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The "defendant received the trust fund as early as July, 1799, and a list of the creditors, of whom the plaintiff was one, and he promised to distribute the fund among the creditors, according to a list of them, named in a receipt which he gave to Creighton. He has not done it, and the plaintiff filed his bill in April, 1803. The defendant renders no sufficient excuse for not distributing this fund. He appears to have been guilty of negligence, and he does not show what he did with the fund in the mean time. The presumption is, that he appropriated [85]*85it to his own use. He is justly chargeable with interest, on the fund, from the time it was converted into cash, and with the costs of suit. This is the rule of the court in the case of a negligent trustee, and the cases which were cited by the plaintiff’s counsel, particularly the one of Treves v. Townshend, in 1 Bro. 384, 385., are to this point. Let tiie decree he so entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Thompson, 1 Johns. Ch. 82 (N.Y. 1814).

1 Johns. Ch. 82 (Gray v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Oosterhoudt
1 Gibb. Surr. 516 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1896)
In re Barnes
23 N.Y.S. 600 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
In re the judicial settlement of the accounts of Wiles
1 Connoly 58 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1888)
In re Butler's Estate
9 N.Y.S. 641 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1888)
Rundle v. . Allison
34 N.Y. 180 (New York Court of Appeals, 1866)
Sedam v. Williams
21 F. Cas. 974 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1845)