Gray v. The State Bar
This text of 1 Cal. 2d 226 (Gray v. The State Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that the transaction which formed the basis of the charges preferred against petitioner, and which resulted in a recommendation by the Board of Governors of The State Bar that he be suspended from practice of the law for a period of one year, involved a party or parties who participated therein with petitioner, but who were not proceeded against and whose conduct in the matter has not been inquired into, it is hereby ordered that this entire proceeding be remanded to the Board of Governors with directions to reopen the same, and by proper orders to bring before it for investigation any members of [227]*227The State Bar who directly participated in the said transaction, or take such further steps as may seem meet and proper.
Shenk, J., Waste, C. J., and Thompson, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cal. 2d 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-the-state-bar-cal-1934.