Gray v. Mann

Supreme Court of Florida

Gray v. Mann

47 Fla. 162

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 47 Fla. 162 (Gray v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. Mann, 47 Fla. 162 (Fla. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Following a general verdict for the defendant, a judgment was entered for costs only. Such judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. 877; Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa, 47 Fla. 135, 36 South. Rep. — . Writ dismissed.

Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Cockrell, JJ., concur.

Carter, P. J., and Shackleford and Whitfield, JJ., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— Following a general verdict for the defendant, a judgment was entered for costs only. Such judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. 877; Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa, 47 Fla. 135, 36 South. Rep. — . Writ dismissed.

Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Cockrell, JJ., concur.

Carter, P. J., and Shackleford and Whitfield, JJ., concur in the opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 Fla. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-mann-fla-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack