Gray v. Mann
47 Fla. 162
Opinion
— Following a general verdict for the defendant, a judgment was entered for costs only. Such judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. 877; Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa, 47 Fla. 135, 36 South. Rep. — . Writ dismissed.
Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Cockrell, JJ., concur.
Carter, P. J., and Shackleford and Whitfield, JJ., concur in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. Mann, 47 Fla. 162 (Fla. 1904).
47 Fla. 162 (Gray v. Mann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caufield v. Cantele
837 So. 2d 371 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Craft v. Clarembeaux
162 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
In re Carol Florida Corp.
118 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
McGeachy v. Bush
55 Fla. 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Dexter v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
52 Fla. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)