Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa
This text of 47 Fla. 135 (Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Upon the trial of an action for trespass the jury found for the defendant, whereupon the following judgment alone was entered: “It is ordered by the court [136]*136that the defendant do have and recover of and from the plaintiff its costs expended in and about their suit.”
Such a judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Paterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Sav. Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. —.
Writ of error dismissed.
All-concur, except Taylor, C. J., absent on account of sickness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 Fla. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cobb-v-county-of-santa-rosa-fla-1904.