Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa

47 Fla. 135
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— Upon the trial of an action for trespass the jury found for the defendant, whereupon the following judgment alone was entered: “It is ordered by the court [136]*136that the defendant do have and recover of and from the plaintiff its costs expended in and about their suit.”

Such a judgment will not support a writ of error. Hall v. Paterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. 348, 35 South. Rep. 3; Birmingham Trust & Sav. Co. v. Jackson County Mill Company, 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. —.

Writ of error dismissed.

All-concur, except Taylor, C. J., absent on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa, 47 Fla. 135 (Fla. 1904).

47 Fla. 135 (Cobb v. County of Santa Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Carol Florida Corp.
118 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Young v. Lassiter
100 So. 362 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Milteer v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
61 So. 749 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)
McGeachy v. Bush
55 Fla. 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Dexter v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
52 Fla. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Gray v. Mann
47 Fla. 162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)